This is to decide how many banned cards a tournament deck on this forum can have. Poll ends in 2 weeks!! Please tell us what you think.

A few votes, but no one actually bothered to post their reasoning behind it?

We're supposed to be an elite team of duelists, so we don't need the power of Forbidden cards to win our duels. Having us play without them may earn our team some respect, and it's a tradition for team duelists to leave the Forbidden cards alone.

That's my stand on it.
- Sevus

Well it's no fun to play with banned cards,because even "only" 1 banned card means that whoever draws it 1st has A BIG advantage over another player..

When Pot of greed was legal,EVERYONE used it and drawing of it was ONLY luck dependant,nothing more..

Well most limited to 1 cards at the moment have broken effects anyway,and not using them means you won't have any chance to win at competitive level,so we really don't need even more broken cards in the game :p

I must agree with Sevus on this, everyone who votes should post his reasoning. I'm no exception. I believe that banned cards were banned for a reason. Don't you think UDE has a reason behind Banned/limited lists? I consider the banning of these cards a rule to be followed no matter what. When I see someone using a banned card, I get this wierd feeling like I wanna shout, hey no cheating! Anyway, I made my point.

i voted no banned card too cuz i believe strong cards does not make the dueler stronger actually they makes you weaker everybody can use banned cards and its a + in duels but what about normal tournaments u will feel something missing like a broken card xD and i agree with Dragon Knight Sevus we should not need banned cards to win

I seriously am against Banned. Everyone in Bounty Hunters are duelists with not just some decent skills but have been some old members of BC and are exceptional duelists. Using a deck without banned cards is a lot more challenging and fun.It brings out the real creativity and talent within us in order to pull out some neat combos. If there are people who disagree with this and aren't into the game as much as we all are, then a maximum of 1 banned card can be allowed for them. Although first preference to no-banned from my side.

No banned cards b/c it could lead to an unbalanced game, especially with the new cards that could support those strategies.

I say 1 banned card because people base their strategy on one card. That one banned card could even be a miricle card if you wanna call it that.